'Intro To Philosophy 1030-202 Essay\r'

'Socrates was non a Sophist; he never took money for his indoctrinateing, and rejected casuistic arguments.For one thing, the sophists taught for money. Socrates did not. For an some other, the sophists used language to clear arguments and to s counseling muckle’s discernment indirect requestless of the truth. Socrates used language to bring in the truth. Socrates lived as an independent man. he did not want to go under each category. He was not paid for his â€Å" jeering” and maieutics. Therefore he was not a sophist, as being a sophist was having a profession. Socrates was genuinely worried round why the young men were so disappointing. Socrates’ young students had been a particular discomposure to him. If Socrates could figure out exactly how the fathers had failed to aright educate their sons, he could save the city and restore capital of Greece to its former glory. Socrates’ fire idea was that human excellence was authentically a kind of have intercourseledge.\r\nSophists were skilled in elaborate transmission line; were they would try and restore the argument they were pore on the stronger side, flush if it was wrong or weaker. This often make them seem devious as they were workings only for the benefit of themselves and their students, who were gallerying to become high school profile speakers or politicians. Socrates was un alike this in that his main focus was not on argumentation or speaking, he quite a focused on marveling virtues to actuallyize morals and ethics. He believed that all opinions were sound which also opposed the views of the Sophists who assumed that the wisest of people were genuinely correct and only they had the magnate to teach.\r\nThe main goal of socrates was unlike that of the sophists. The aim of the Sophists was varied around material stubbornness and desire. They believed do itledge is a means to place and is to be used for political or material gain. Socrates beli eved his questions would encourage personal growing and create a better nightclub as a whole who would show philosophy and ethics. Him only questionig rather than focusing on teaching separates him from the Sophists. This is due to the circumstance that questioning isn’t a real method of teaching and Socrates himself stated â€Å"I know one thing, that I know nothing”. This puts him on the same direct as his interlocutor and gives him an insight to other opinions.\r\nIn Ancient Greece, the sophists were a congregation of teachers of philosophy and rhetoric. This group of Greek philosophers and teachers in the 5th century BC, who speculated on a wide range of subjects flawed arguments superficially correct in its reason, which deliberately disenable argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone. There was a difference between the two, sophists showed that equally costly arguments could be advanced on all side of any issue; they wer e skeptics who doubted that in that respect could be any certain or reliable knowledge. On the other hand, socrates was move to the pursuit of truth and considered it his mission to stress out certain knowledge. Unlike philosophers forwards them, Sophists claimed to be wise enough to teach whatever you might want to know as long as you. Socrates tell he was a citizen of the world. Whether in Athens or elsewhere he was meditating, and he was helping others finding their true selves.\r\nFurthermore, Socrates did not travel from city to city quest new students to teach. He was the opposite in that he remained loyal to his home townsfolk of Athens. This is evident as he started proper popular amongst the people who would often regard him as ‘annoying’. His popularity therefore proves that he wasn’t a travel like the sophists. Socrates has some attri only whenes of the Sophists, such as having students, his general method and aim was contrary to theirs. Socra tes himself states in his apology â€Å"I do thence admit that I am eloquent. just now in how different a way from theirs!” which reinforces the fact that he may be good in rhetoric but his goal is not to teach argumentation and political skills. As a resolvent it is clear that Socrates wanted to simply question people on ethics and morals and not teach for material or prolific gains.\r\n'