Torsional Pendulum Preliminary Experiment Essay Example for Free

Torsional Pendulum overture sample EssayResearch and equationsAs we are working in circular motion, rather than elongated motion, the equations that disturb out help me investigate the Torsional pendulum will have to be derived. Here is how it is derived.Using might= Mass x Acceleration which is what you use for linear motion, this becomes Torque=Moment of Inertia x Angular acceleration. Using Force= -kx from a undecomposable pendulum, this becomes Force=- Torsional Constant x Angular displacementTherefore This brook unquestionably be compared to a=-?2x and becomes However therefore I then found out the exact preparation which allowed me to directly work out I and K. The moment of inertia was simply mL2 However for the Torsional invariant I first found the formula for the polar moment of inertia which was Ip=?d4/32 and the angle of thingmabob ?=TL/GIp this was rearranged to T= GIp/L where T is the Torsional constant, then substituting in Ip I got Torsional constant= Using the equation I can instantaneously substitute in expressions for I and K to get an boilersuit equation which came out to be T=2? T=Time Period I=Moment of Inertia of the bar L=Length of wire G= Shear Modulus of material d= dia musical rhythm of wireThe following web pages were used to help me derive these equationshttp//www.engin.umich.edu/students/ELRC/me211/me211/flash/tors_derivation15.swfhttp//farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node139.htmlPreliminary ExperimentAim To investigate the kind between Time spot and the aloofness of the wire on a Torsional pendulum.Factors to vary and controlTo ensure a fair test I must ready sure that altogether factors that want to vary will change over, therefore as I am canvass the effect of changing the continuance of wire on the sequence period I will only vary the length of wire. This means that the following must stay the equal* Mass of the metallic element bar, including same diameter and length each time, these are all related to the moment of inertia.* Type of wire (material) and its diameter, these are related to the Torsional constant.DiagramEquipment* Retort Stand with clamp to hold the wire and bar when oscillating.* Bung cuff into two halves so I can change length of string easily.* Metal Bar.* Approximately a meter long wire.* S dischargewatch to record the Time periods.* Micrometer to measure diameter of the wire and the metal bar* Meter long ruler to measure out correct lengths of wire and measure length of the bar.Method* Set up the apparatus as shown in the diagram above.* Ensure the wire is pertinacious firmly around the centre of the bar, so that when left freely it rests in its equilibrium position.* Using 0.1 meters as the starting point, make the length 0.1m using a meter rule, measuring from the base of the bung to the top of the bar at the knot.* Turn the bar 90 degrees anticlockwise and release it, start the auction blockwatch at the same time of release.* The time perio d for one complete quiver is for the end of the bar to go around clockwise at once and changes direction then anticlockwise until it changes again, the moment it stops just originally changing direction for a second time is one oscillation. Allow 5 complete oscillations for once length and divide the end time by five.* Record the time period on a suitable table.* Loosen the clamp and increase the length by 0.1m and repeat above steps until some 8 results are complete.* Now measure the length of the bar using a meter ruler, and the diameter of the bar using a micrometer. Also measure the length of the wire using a meter ruler and its diameter using a micrometer. Record all these results.To ensure that the experiment is carried out in safe environment I will make sure that I have plenty of quad around me, with any obstacles removed to ensure the experiment can run smoothly.TheoryIf unsophisticated sympathetic motion applies, which I am assuming it does as shown in the equations above, also there is a eject similarity between the time period for a Torsional pendulum and for a bulk spring system which is simple harmonic motion, as shown in these 2 equations. andSimple harmonic motion is defined as an oscillation in which the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to its displacement from equilibrium and has a restoring force say back towards equilibrium.I am investigating for the preliminary experiment the effect on time period when the length of wire is changed. From the equation derived T=2? I can see that theoretically the blood between time period and length should be T?L0.5. Therefore an increase in length will increase the time period.ResultsLength (mm)Time Period (s)Log llog T1006.16-1.000.792008.18-0.700.913009.59-0.520.9840011.00-0.401.0450012.18-0.301.0960013.45-0.221.1370014.22-0.161.1580015.32-0.101.19Extra Results measurementDiameter of wire0.42mmmass of bar201.1gramslength of bar204mmConclusionFrom the graph I can come to a si mple conclusion that as the length increases the time period increases. However it is obvious that this is not a linear relationship, therefore I need to use log log graphs to help me get the relationship.As I originally worked out that there is a relationship between time period and length for the Torsional pendulum, I can therefore say that T is proportional to l (T? l). However I can change this to T=alb where a and b are constants to be determined.I can determine these using a log log graph where logT=blogl+logA which is in the form y=mx+cUsing the value of logT and logl in the results table above, I produced the log log graph below.From the graph you can see that the incline which is b = 0.4375And that logA=1.225, therefore to get A I would unlog it, 101.225= 16.788 (3.d.p)So if A= 16.788 and b=0.4283 then the relationship becomes T=16.788 x l0.4375EvaluationThere are understandably difficulties and problems with this method which will realize inaccuracies in the results. I w ill now outline the problems and estimate a percentage misunderstanding for each one.* Measurement of the length of the wire. The meter ruler is accurate to 0.5mm, as the smallest sectionalization is 1cm. The measurements I do were 10cm to 80cm, therefore supreme mistake is (0.5mm/100mm) x100= 0.5%, and the minimum actus reus is (0.5mm/800mm) x100= 0.0625% error. Therefore average error is approximately (0.5+0.0625)/2=0.28125%.* There is also error in the time periods as its difficult to know exactly when to stop the stopwatch. You must stop it when it stops and is just about to change direction. However I may stop to early or too late, this causes random error, and therefore time period will be higher or bring low than the true value. I predict that this will cause a maximum error of 0.5 seconds, this includes the error for a human reaction time, which can only react as fast as 0.1 seconds. Max error for the results I obtained would be (0.5/6.162)x100=8.114% and minimum er ror (0.5/15.318)x100=3.264%. These errors are very significant and will definitely cause inaccuracies in my results. The time I recorded was accurate to 0.05seconds, therefore maximum reading error was (0.005/6.162)x100=0.081%, this is that a fold less significant than experimental error.* The scale is accurate to 0.05 grams. Therefore maximum error is (0.05/201.1) x 100 = 0.0249%, therefore this error was not so significant.* The micrometer is accurate to 0.005mm, as smallest division is 0.01mm, therefore error for my reading was (0.005/0.41) x 100 = 1.219%, this error was quite significant and a lot larger than I expected.The value for the gradient I obtained was 0.4375, however I was expecting 0.5, therefore there is clearly errors in the time period and length, which is what determined the gradient, with reasons for these errors stated above. The error for the gradient will be the make out error of the time and length, therefore approximately 6% error, when adding average mos t significant error of the time period and length.Using the Equation T=2? I can work out the overall error of my experiment. As 2? x =T and as I found out that T=16.788 x l0.4375Therefore 2? should be equal to 16.788 if my experiment had no errors. I will now work out how close to this value I actually got.=2? = 14.12Therefore the total error from what the true value should be is (16.788-14.12)/16.788 x 100= 15.89%From all the percentage errors above I can see that there are clearly issues with this preliminary experiment and that changes will have to be made for the final experiment to increase accuracy and reduce errors.