Origins and Causes of the Cold War

&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- wherefore the iron curtain descended production lines and causes of the insensate state of fight ROHAN SINGH SEPTEMBER 2012 Name of University The due west Bengal guinea pig University of Juridical Sciences SubjectPolitical Science Date of entering1st October, 2012. Why the Iron curtain descended A study into the origins and causes of the cold war INTRODUCTION On April 16, 1947, Bernard Baruch, former advisor to former U. S.Presidents, waste Truman and Woodrow Wilson came up with the term cold struggle to describe the breakdown in relations amidst the two forces at the clock time-the join States of America and the Soviet articulation. Historian Walter Lippman, his friend used it in the New York herald Tribune-which mark its introduction in popular media. This mutual antagonism in the midst of the two nations manifested itself, not in entirely-out war except in attacks by economic sa nctions, proxy wars, the building of alliances propaganda war off the beaten track(predicate)e, enmeshed in an overarching article of faith of non-cooperation.In this context, before delving into the causes, which this essay seeks to do, it is imperative to tubercle that the fact that the two superpowers fought on the same side during orb state of war II was nothing but a marriage of convenience, where they were united against the common enemy rather than on grounds of a common cause. The disbeliefs, ensuing due to the differences in ideology and motives on the global scale had not been occluded by any means, merely erased for the time being. THE BREAKDOWN OF THE MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCETo fully watch the origins of the Cold War and the breakdown in relations,it is necessary for us to cypher the Yalta, Potsdam and Tehran conferences that occurred towards the dying stages of the Second World War. The Tehran Conference held in 1943 was attended by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stali n and even though, the leading went to Tehran with divers(prenominal) goals in mind, the quintessential objective, which was to open a second front against Ger numerous, was achieved. The big iii met again in Yalta in February, 1945.Relations again seemed cordial and the tierce leaders agreed on various key points, such as the governance of the United Nations, punishment of the Nazi war criminals, the division of Germany and Berlin into four zones, the safekeeping of free elections in east Europe. Yet, in that respect were perilous signs foreshadowing the origin of the Cold War as the three disagreed about what was to be make about Poland. Stalins demand that the Soviet Union should be addicted all land east of the Oder-Neisse Line was not taken as well as favorably by the otherwise two leaders.When they met at Potsdam again in July 1945, relations were not so amicable. Various changes had taken place in the transnational stage since Yalta. Firstly, the Soviet Unions Re d regular army had taken control of the Baltic States under the pretext of liberating them. Secondly, both the United States and Great Britain had different leaders representing them. Attlee replaced Churchill and Truman replaced Roosevelt. Both the new leaders were far to a greater extent suspicious of Stalin and his red agenda than their predecessors had been. Fourthly, the Americans had already tested an component bomb on July 16, 1945.While Stalin was informed of this development at the conference, the motive substructure the Manhatten Project was a manifestation of the suspicion the leaders harbored towards the Communist as they wanted to ensure that Japan was invaded by them and not the Soviet Union. Truman similarly disagreed with Stalins request for a Soviet sphere of influence and kept on pressing for free elections in the liberated states of Eastern Europe, which Stalin objected to on grounds of Soviet security. The expansion of the USSR east of the Oder-Neisse line in Poland remained a topic of dispute.The setting up of a brass in Poland that know all three powers, termed as a Provisional Government of National Unity ( in any case known as the Lublin Poles), which effectively rendered the Polish government in exile a thing of the past was another source of conflict. WHO WAS TO darned FOR THE rimy WAR? USA, USSR OR SIMPLE IDEOLOGY? Now, we come to the three schools of thought on the origins of the Cold War. The traditionalists, guide by the eminent historian George Kennan believe that the Stalin and USSR were to blame, owing to their agenda, which involved expanding Communism and establishing control over all the Eastern-European tates. In the 1960s and 1970s, Russian historians, who propounded the revisionist view believed that the United States were to blame for the war as the leaders had become paranoid about Communist aggression, whereas Stalins motives were purely defensive and the establishment of his sphere of influence in Eastern Eu rope was justified on grounds that USSR had suffered grave economic losses during the war and it seemed prudent to ensure that neighboring states werent hostile.This view became more popular during the 1960s and 1970s as the inherent paranoia regarding both the outer and internal Communist Threat, better known as The Red Scare, propounded by the Senator Joseph McCarthysubsided in the United States and people become exceptionally critical of American foreign policywith the emergence of the Vietnam War. The third view, which is accepted by roughly historians crossways the globe, including this author is the post-revisionist view, which says that it would be unfair to blame the origin of the Cold War on any of the sides without placing equal blame on the other.Furthermore, to fully understand, the causes back end the Cold War, we need to consider a multitude of factors. Firstly, the World War II had a detrimental impact on the economies of both Britain and France and uncomplete o f them were the superpowers they had once been. Thus, the USA and the USSR were now the remaining superpowers, two superpowers, which had starkly different and almost contradictory ideologies on government and economics. The Soviet system of government was a Communist one based on the Marxist principles of equating and the welfare state, which involved central planning at the expense of somebody freedom.On the other hand, the United States was a capitalist democracy, which espouses the ownership of private wealth, enter in the pursuit of profits, at the expense of economic disparity. This besides led to a breakdown in communication. Every act was construed by the other superpower to be a propaganda move to thwart the other. The Truman Doctrine, which vowed to provide soldiery service to European states from internal or external aggression and the marshal Plan, largely responsible for the economic rebuilding of Europe were interpreted, perhaps rightly, by the Soviet Union as mea ns of spreading USAs capitalist agenda.Stalin responded to the capitalist expansionist agenda of the Marshall Plan by setting up the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) to economically aid the members of the Eastern block. ACTION AND REACTIONCOLD WAR CONFLICTS FROM 1945-1960 Each superpower wanted to spread their specific ideology and contain the others, which resulted in a result of propaganda measures, alliancesand proxy wars. The first major cold war conflict was the Berlin blockade and airlift of 1948-49.Stalin cut of all transport relate to West Berlin, which was under Allied Control, thus cutting of all food supplies to the city. Truman ordered an airlift with food supplies through B-52 bombers, thus ensuring that the population and indecorum of the zone were kept alive. In 1949, Stalin called of the blockade. The iron curtain-which was a symbolisation of both ideological and physical division between Eastern and occidental Europe became permanent and the ar ms race started to pick up pace.The horse opera nations were convinced of what a potential threat the Soviets could be, which prompted the USA to supplement its military machine deployment with political affiliations by signing the North Atlantic Treaty administration in April, 1949, emphasizing the principle of collective self-defense. This, along with the rearmament of The Federal state of Germany (West Germany, which was in the Allied Zone) was met with the creation of the War aphorism Pact in 1955. The Soviets also set up a Communist Information Bureau (Cominform), which served as a forum that gathered all communist Eastern Bloc nations.Throughout the 1950s, both countries continued to build up their military arsenal- of both stodgy and nuclear weapons. This form of action and reaction due to high levels of suspicion and hostility towards the other played a key role in laying the foundations of the Cold War that ensued. The final Cold War participation of the 1950s which l aid down the foundation for the tension that would exist in a dissociated Europe for the next forty years was the Berlin Crisis, which ensued from 1958-61.In 1961, The Soviet Union constructed a wall between east and West Germany in the heart of Berlin. Khrushchev claimed that it was an attempt to curb the expansion of western influence of fascistic attempting to influence the mindset of the people of East Germany through brainwashing and coercion. However, most historians believe that it was simply an attempt to curb the exodus of many immigrants (a number that has been pegged at 3. 5 million before the construction of The Wall) to West Germany, which was doing a great deal better economically.Throughout the Cold War, the war was a physical representation of the divide across the iron curtain and an emblem of the conflicts that it represented. CONCLUSION THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND THE BEGINNING OF A NEW WORLD ORDER The years 1945-1960 laid down the foundations for the period of supranational and diplomatic tensions that would ensue between the two superpowers. While, all-out- war- never broke out, the two countries policies of containment and brinksmanship brought them close to it on many occasions, such as during the Cu throw away Missile Crisis of 1962.Of course, the Cuban Missile crisis also helped in improving communication ties and kickstarted the process of arms limitation by the setting up of measures such as the Partial test ban treaty in 1963 and the Moscow-Washington hotline. The period 1969-79 saw a thaw in relations between the two superpowers- a period known as detente, which ended with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The end of the Cold War, which was pronounced by the fall of the berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 led to a new world order.In this new era, there has generally been a decrease in inter-state conflicts but other threats to internationalist piece such as conflicts of ethnicity, rel igion, militancy and terrorism are however rampant. Communal tensions in regions such as Sudan, Somalia and the Congo are in vogue(p) epitomes of this form of conflict and to truly establish a framework of international piece it will be imperative for national governments, in conjunctive with the United Nations to make addressing such issues a priority. BIBLIOGRAPHY Arthur Bliss Lane. I saw Poland betrayed An American Ambassador Reports to the American People.Indianapolis TheBobbs-Merrill Company, 1948. pp. 5. Church, George, license The Berlin Wall,Time. Available at<http//www. time. com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,959058,00. html> (Accessed 29th September,2012. ) Cleary,Helen and Edwards,Phil (2005),Fact FilePotsdam Conference. BBC narrative. Availableat<http//www. bbc. co. uk/ annals/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a1144829. shtml? sectionId=7&articleId=1144829> (Accessed 28th September 2012. ) Czechoslovakia A Country national, Glenn E. Curtis, ed. (W ashington, D. C. Federal Research Division of the subroutine library of Congress, 1992. )Church, George,Freedom The Berlin Wall,Time. Available at<http//www. time. com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,959058,00. html> (Accessed 29th September,2012. ) Glass,Andrew (2010)Bernard baruch coins the term Cold War. Politico. Available at < http//www. politico. com/news/stories/0410/35862. html > ( Accessed 26th September, 2010. ) Fried, Albert (1997). McCarthyism, The Great American Red Scare A Documentary History. Oxford University Press. pp10. Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering newfangled World History. quaternate ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. Scott,Lenn(2001)International register 1900-90. n Baylis, Jon and Smith, Steve (2001),The globalization of world politicsAn introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. London. pp55-63. Yilmaz,Muzaffer (2008),The New World OrderAn outline of the charge Cold-War Era,Turkish Journal of Internation al Relations. v. 7(4) Available at http//www. alternativesjournal. net/volume7/Number4/myilmaz. pdf (Accessed 1st October,2012. ) &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 2 . Glass,Andrew (2010)Bernard baruch coins the term Cold War. Politico( Accessed 26th September, 2010. 3 . Ibid 4 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4thed.Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 122. 5 . Churchill, Winston Spencer (1951). The Second World War Closing the Ring. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. pp. 642. 6 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 123. 7 . Ibid 8 . The elections were held during the Conference and Churchill was replaced midway through the Conference. SeeLowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 122. 9 . Cleary,Helen and Edwards,Phil (2005),Fact FilePotsdam Conference. BBC Archives (Accessed 28th September 2 012) 10 .Arthur Bliss Lane. I saw Poland betrayed An American Ambassador Reports to the American People. Indianapolis The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1948. 11 . Supra note 5 12 . ibid 13 . Fried, Albert (1997). McCarthyism, The Great American Red Scare A Documentary History. Oxford University Press. 14 . Supra note 5 15 . Scott,Lenn(2001)International history 1900-90. in Baylis, Jon and Smith, Steve (2001),The globalization of world politicsAn introduction to international relations. 2nded. Oxford University Press. London. pp55-63. 16 . Czechoslovakia A Country Study, Glenn E. Curtis, ed. (Washington, D.C. Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress, 1992. ) 17 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. 18 . Supra note 14 19 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. 20 . Church, George,Freedom The Berlin Wall,Time (Accessed 29th Septembe r 2012) 21 . Supra note 14 22 . ibid 23 . Yilmaz,Muzaffer (2008),The New World OrderAn outline of the Post Cold-War Era,Turkish Journal of International Relations. v. 7(4) (Accessed 1st October,2012)